SynthBoard
PricingEnterprise

Product

  • Features
  • Session Modes
  • Synths
  • Session Assistant
  • Free Session
  • Pricing
  • Compare

Solutions

  • For Founders
  • For Creators
  • For Product Leaders
  • For Consultants
  • For Teams
  • All use cases

By Method

  • AI Boardroom
  • AI Advisory Board
  • Decision Intelligence
  • AI Pre-Mortem
  • AI Stress Test
  • AI Council
  • Decision Autopsy
  • See all methods

By Decision

  • AI for Hiring
  • AI for Pricing
  • AI for Pivots
  • AI for Fundraising
  • AI for B2B vs B2C
  • See all decisions

By Audience

  • For Founders
  • For Consultants
  • For Investors
  • For Operators
  • For Coaches
  • See all audiences

Alternatives

  • McKinsey alternative
  • Business coach alternative
  • Advisory board alternative
  • Strategy consultant alternative
  • See all alternatives

Developers

  • MCP Server
  • REST API
  • API Reference
  • Webhooks
  • Docs & Help
  • Security

Resources

  • Docs & Help
  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Contact

Company

  • Manifesto
  • About
  • Enterprise

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Security
  • Refund Policy
Stay Updated

Get AI Insights Weekly

Join our newsletter for product updates, decision-making insights, and exclusive member content.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.

SynthBoardDecision Intelligence Platform
© 2026 SynthBoard AI

Built with ❤️ for the future of AI collaboration

  1. Home
  2. Alternatives
  3. Operating Methods
Alternative · Operating Methods

A boardroom that fits the Traction method

Traction by Gino Wickman lays out a complete operating system for entrepreneurial companies. SynthBoard runs the structured boardroom that fits inside the method — especially for self-implementers and the issues that arrive between quarterlies.

Start Free See How It Works

What you get

IDS, run by a panel

Identify-Discuss-Solve the Traction way, with five lenses arguing the top issue from your L10.

A rocks-and-V/TO sounding board

Stress-test candidate rocks, V/TO updates, and accountability charts before they go to the leadership team.

A documented synthesis for the next quarterly

Every session ends with a synthesis you can bring to the quarterly day — implementer-led or self-led.

Questions people ask

Real questions. Multiple expert perspectives. Every time.

“Which of our candidate rocks survives a panel debate — and which is a wish in disguise?”

“How would a Traction-aligned panel run IDS on this issue?”

“What is the steel-man case against the new accountability chart we are drafting?”

“Where is our V/TO leaning on yesterday's market assumptions?”

“Should this issue go to the L10, the quarterly, or a SynthBoard session?”

Your Expert Team

Each expert thinks independently — they won’t just agree with each other.

The CEO

The CEO

Holds the through-line on company strategy and stakeholder trade-offs.

The Operator

The Operator

Turns strategy into the boring, sequenced work that actually ships.

The Strategist

The Strategist

Maps competitive dynamics and strategic options across multi-year horizons.

The CFO

The CFO

Pressure-tests unit economics, runway, and capital allocation.

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Questions every premise. Finds blind spots others miss.

What you’ll get

A synthesized recommendation from your team of experts — not just opinions, but structured analysis.

+2
5 experts analyzed
Synthesis Complete
Consensus Score74%

Moderate Agreement

Key Recommendations

Rock specificity is the difference between commitment and aspiration
Two sequenced rocks beat one impossible one
Ownership clarity matters more than ambition at the rock level
The 90-day discipline of Traction is the source of the value — respect it

Synthesized Recommendation

The candidate rock as written is a wish — too broad, no clear owner, 90-day completion implausible. Break it into two rocks: one for the structural decision (this quarter, owned by the COO), one for the rollout (next quarter, owned by the VP People).

Full analysis continues with detailed reasoning, trade-offs, and next steps...

Watch Out For

The team will resist breaking the rock — frame it as accountability, not retreat
Sequence the rollout rock for next quarter, not later — keep momentum
Document the rationale so future quarterlies do not re-invent the same rock

Expert Opinions

Try it yourself — free
The CEO
“Traction tells you when to meet. SynthBoard helps you decide what you actually decided.”
The CEO — Executive judgmentThe CEO on what each layer is for

Why SynthBoard for this

Method-aligned, not method-replacing

SynthBoard fits inside the Traction system — IDS-shaped sessions, V/TO stress-tests, rocks debates.

Multi-agent debate, not just a meeting structure

Traction structures the meeting. SynthBoard structures the debate inside it.

Between the quarterlies

Traction quarterlies are 4x a year. SynthBoard is there for the issues that land on the other 350 days.

Free to start vs implementer day-rate

SynthBoard is free to start. Self-implementers can use it to tighten the system without paying for facilitation.

Common questions

The questions people ask before they sign up.

Does SynthBoard replace the Traction method?

No — Traction is a complete operating system with a meeting cadence, a vocabulary, and a 90-day discipline. SynthBoard is a structured boardroom that fits inside the method. Use it for the issues that need real debate, the V/TO stress-tests, and the candidate-rocks decisions.

When should I use SynthBoard alongside Traction?

For IDS on the hardest issues from the L10. For candidate-rocks debate before the quarterly. For V/TO updates before the leadership team sees them. For the issues that arrive between quarterlies and cannot wait three months. Traction holds the system; SynthBoard holds the debate.

Can I run Traction without an implementer and use SynthBoard?

Yes — and many self-implementers do exactly that. The Traction book is sufficient to run the system; an implementer adds facilitation skill and accountability. SynthBoard does not replace the implementer's human role, but it does materially raise the quality of the structured debate inside L10s and quarterlies.

When is the full Traction method still the right call?

Always, if the company is going to run it. Traction is the operating system; SynthBoard is a tool inside it. If your question is "should we adopt Traction at all," the answer depends on company size and leadership-team maturity — not on whether SynthBoard exists. Read the book first.

How does the price compare?

SynthBoard is free to start; paid tiers run low double-digit dollars per month. Traction is a $20 book. An implementer is $2k-$5k+ per day. The three layers — book, implementer, SynthBoard — are complementary, not substitutes.

What does SynthBoard NOT do that the Traction method does?

No meeting structure, no shared leadership-team vocabulary, no 90-day rocks discipline, no V/TO template, no accountability chart system, no scorecard. SynthBoard is a structured debate tool that fits inside Traction; it is not the operating system.

Keep exploring

Adjacent decisions, audiences, and methods inside SynthBoard.

EOS alternative

The EOS-specific comparison.

Explore

EOS implementer alternative

The implementer-specific comparison.

Explore

See the /vs/ comparison

For comparing facilitator categories.

Explore

AI for operations decisions

Operations calls Traction would surface.

Explore

All comparisons

The full comparison hub.

Explore

AI Boardroom manifesto

The product manifesto.

Explore

A different mechanic for the same hard call.

Convene 24 expert Synths to debate it across rounds. Free to start. No card.

Start Free See Pricing