SynthBoard
PricingEnterprise

Product

  • Features
  • Session Modes
  • Synths
  • Session Assistant
  • Free Session
  • Pricing
  • Compare

Solutions

  • For Founders
  • For Creators
  • For Product Leaders
  • For Consultants
  • For Teams
  • All use cases

By Method

  • AI Boardroom
  • AI Advisory Board
  • Decision Intelligence
  • AI Pre-Mortem
  • AI Stress Test
  • AI Council
  • Decision Autopsy
  • See all methods

By Decision

  • AI for Hiring
  • AI for Pricing
  • AI for Pivots
  • AI for Fundraising
  • AI for B2B vs B2C
  • See all decisions

By Audience

  • For Founders
  • For Consultants
  • For Investors
  • For Operators
  • For Coaches
  • See all audiences

Alternatives

  • McKinsey alternative
  • Business coach alternative
  • Advisory board alternative
  • Strategy consultant alternative
  • See all alternatives

Developers

  • MCP Server
  • REST API
  • API Reference
  • Webhooks
  • Docs & Help
  • Security

Resources

  • Docs & Help
  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Contact

Company

  • Manifesto
  • About
  • Enterprise

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Security
  • Refund Policy
Stay Updated

Get AI Insights Weekly

Join our newsletter for product updates, decision-making insights, and exclusive member content.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.

SynthBoardDecision Intelligence Platform
© 2026 SynthBoard AI

Built with ❤️ for the future of AI collaboration

  1. Home
  2. By Role
  3. VCs
AI Advisor · VCs

The principal who never misses a partnership meeting

A boardroom for VC pattern-matching — five synths that argue every deal, follow-on, and portfolio call with the rigor of a Monday morning IC.

Start Free See How It Works

What you get

Pre-IC structured diligence

Walk into Monday with a synthesized recommendation already stress-tested. The Skeptic surfaces the partner question you didn't want.

Follow-on logic

Defending pro-rata in a hot round, doubling down in a hard one, supporting a bridge — argued with portfolio-construction framing.

Portfolio support and intervention

When to call the CEO, when to push for a change, when to write off — modeled with The Strategist and The Empath.

Fund-level decisions

Fund-pacing, sector concentration, LP-narrative coherence — debated with The Investor and The Analyst.

Questions people ask

Real questions. Multiple expert perspectives. Every time.

“I'm leading this round. Strongest counter-argument to my thesis?”

“Two portfolio companies need follow-on this quarter and we can only support one. Which?”

“A portfolio CEO is asking us to recruit a CFO. Get involved or stay arm's length?”

“Should we participate pro-rata in a hot round at 3x our entry, or save dry powder for a down market?”

“Our fund is 60% deployed in 18 months. Slow down, lean in, or raise the next fund early?”

Your Expert Team

Each expert thinks independently — they won’t just agree with each other.

The Investor

The Investor

Thinks like a board, an LP, and a downstream acquirer at once.

The Strategist

The Strategist

Maps competitive dynamics and strategic options across multi-year horizons.

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Questions every premise. Finds blind spots others miss.

The Data Scientist

The Data Scientist

Pulls the analysis behind every confident claim.

The Futurist

The Futurist

Pulls the 5- and 10-year scenarios most teams forget to model.

What you’ll get

A synthesized recommendation from your team of experts — not just opinions, but structured analysis.

+2
5 experts analyzed
Synthesis Complete
Consensus Score71%

Moderate Agreement

Key Recommendations

Unit-economics-positive companies have lower follow-on risk through downturns
The narrative company can usually find capital elsewhere; the margin company is what your fund's reputation gets built on
Backing both at half-pro-rata is the wrong compromise — concentrate conviction

Synthesized Recommendation

Support the company with better unit economics, not the one with the better narrative. Hot stories without sustainable economics get marked down in the next round; you protect optionality by backing margin first.

Full analysis continues with detailed reasoning, trade-offs, and next steps...

Watch Out For

If the narrative company is your highest-profile investment, signaling matters — communicate the non-participation clearly
Half-supporting both creates a follow-on credibility problem with founders and LPs

Expert Opinions

Try it yourself — free
The Skeptic
“Every VC fund has a story it tells about how it picks. The boardroom is the place that story gets pressure-tested before another check leaves the door.”
The Skeptic — Assumption stress-test

Why SynthBoard for this

IC-prep speed

Diligence-to-IC compresses from a week to an evening. The Boardroom doesn't replace the work; it accelerates the synthesis.

Partner-grade opposition

The Skeptic and Devil's Advocate argue at the level your senior partner would — without the relationship cost.

Pattern memory across deals

The Boardroom remembers your prior bets, thesis evolution, and stated learnings. Builds the decision-journal venture firms talk about but rarely keep.

Portfolio-construction native

Single-deal analysis is everywhere. The Boardroom argues each deal in the context of your portfolio shape and fund pacing.

Common questions

The questions people ask before they sign up.

Does this replace human partner debate?

No — partner debate has shared-accountability value the Boardroom can't replicate. Most VCs use SynthBoard as the pre-IC structuring tool, so the partnership meeting starts with synthesized opposition rather than building it from scratch.

How does it handle deal confidentiality?

Sessions are private to your account. For deals under signed NDA, use anonymized context (sector + stage + team profile, no names). The structural recommendation works without identifying details. Validate against your fund's AI-tool policies first.

Can analysts and associates use it?

Yes — Team plans support fund-wide workspaces. Many firms have associates running pre-pitch sessions to surface the question partners will ask, before the partner sees the deck.

Will the Boardroom understand stage-specific dynamics (seed vs. Series B vs. growth)?

Yes. Set up a stage-focus profile; synth reasoning calibrates. The Investor synth knows seed dynamics differ from Series B differ from growth-stage; rules of thumb, market comps, and likely term-structure all calibrate by stage.

Can this help with LP communication and fundraising?

Indirectly — the decision-journal aspect produces documented rationale you can reference in LP letters. The Boardroom doesn't draft LP comms, but having structured deal memos makes the LP work materially easier.

How current is the Boardroom on venture market conditions?

Synths reason from general patterns. For specific current-market data (recent multiples, sector valuations), pair with your data subscriptions (Pitchbook, Crunchbase). The Boardroom is the conviction layer; data subscriptions are the inputs.

Keep exploring

Adjacent decisions, audiences, and methods inside SynthBoard.

Investor edition

Broader investor edition.

Explore

Angel edition

For private angels and syndicate leads.

Explore

Partnership framework

Strategic-partnership framework.

Explore

Investment pre-mortem

Pre-mortem an investment.

Explore

Fund workspace

Fund-wide workspaces.

Explore

VC sessions

Real VC sessions.

Explore

The advisor you don't have, on demand.

250 bonus credits at signup. 150 free every month. No card required.

Start Free See Pricing