SynthBoard
PricingEnterprise

Product

  • Features
  • Session Modes
  • Synths
  • Session Assistant
  • Free Session
  • Pricing
  • Compare

Solutions

  • For Founders
  • For Creators
  • For Product Leaders
  • For Consultants
  • For Teams
  • All use cases

By Method

  • AI Boardroom
  • AI Advisory Board
  • Decision Intelligence
  • AI Pre-Mortem
  • AI Stress Test
  • AI Council
  • Decision Autopsy
  • See all methods

By Decision

  • AI for Hiring
  • AI for Pricing
  • AI for Pivots
  • AI for Fundraising
  • AI for B2B vs B2C
  • See all decisions

By Audience

  • For Founders
  • For Consultants
  • For Investors
  • For Operators
  • For Coaches
  • See all audiences

Alternatives

  • McKinsey alternative
  • Business coach alternative
  • Advisory board alternative
  • Strategy consultant alternative
  • See all alternatives

Developers

  • MCP Server
  • REST API
  • API Reference
  • Webhooks
  • Docs & Help
  • Security

Resources

  • Docs & Help
  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Contact

Company

  • Manifesto
  • About
  • Enterprise

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Security
  • Refund Policy
Stay Updated

Get AI Insights Weekly

Join our newsletter for product updates, decision-making insights, and exclusive member content.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.

SynthBoardDecision Intelligence Platform
© 2026 SynthBoard AI

Built with ❤️ for the future of AI collaboration

  1. Home
  2. By Role
  3. Investors
AI Advisor · Investors

For the conviction calls that need more than your own thesis

The Investor, the Strategist, the Skeptic, the Data Scientist, and the Futurist debate every deal and portfolio decision — so your conviction is earned, not inherited.

Start Free See How It Works

What you get

Investment-thesis stress-testing

The Skeptic and Devil's Advocate argue against your thesis with the same rigor you'd hope an LP would. Catch the hole before you write the check.

Portfolio construction

Position sizing, sector concentration, follow-on strategy — modeled with The Investor and The Analyst.

Deal-evaluation framework

Team, market, product, terms — each dimension debated separately, then synthesized into a conviction call.

Exit and rebalancing decisions

Hold vs. sell vs. average down — argued with second-order tax and signaling effects framed explicitly.

Questions people ask

Real questions. Multiple expert perspectives. Every time.

“I have conviction on this deal. Walk me through the strongest reasons I'm wrong.”

“Two follow-on opportunities at different stages. Concentrate or diversify?”

“A portfolio company has missed every milestone. Double down, hold, or write it off?”

“Should I take pro-rata in the next round or sell into secondary at current valuation?”

“How do I size my position when the founder is exceptional but the market is unclear?”

Your Expert Team

Each expert thinks independently — they won’t just agree with each other.

The Investor

The Investor

Thinks like a board, an LP, and a downstream acquirer at once.

The Strategist

The Strategist

Maps competitive dynamics and strategic options across multi-year horizons.

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Questions every premise. Finds blind spots others miss.

The Data Scientist

The Data Scientist

Pulls the analysis behind every confident claim.

The Futurist

The Futurist

Pulls the 5- and 10-year scenarios most teams forget to model.

What you’ll get

A synthesized recommendation from your team of experts — not just opinions, but structured analysis.

+2
5 experts analyzed
Synthesis Complete
Consensus Score67%

Moderate Agreement

Key Recommendations

100% pro-rata in a single position concentrates portfolio risk too much at this fund stage
Secondary at current valuation crystallizes paper gains into usable capital
Partial-pro-rata signals continued conviction without binary commitment

Synthesized Recommendation

Take 50% of pro-rata, sell 25% into secondary. Preserves upside if the next round prices well; locks in a partial return that funds three new positions; and signals continued conviction without full concentration.

Full analysis continues with detailed reasoning, trade-offs, and next steps...

Watch Out For

Selling secondary may trigger ROFR or board notification — check your docs
If the next round is up-round, partial secondary will feel like a missed gain in hindsight — that's the cost of diversification

Expert Opinions

Try it yourself — free
The Investor
“Returns come from the deals you didn't do as much as the ones you did. The boardroom is the cheapest way to test conviction before the IC vote — or before the angel check clears.”
The Investor — Capital perspective

Why SynthBoard for this

Conviction stress-testing on demand

You can't always get a partner to argue against your deal. The Boardroom can — at any hour, with structured opposition.

Decision-journal continuity

The Boardroom remembers your thesis, prior bets, and stated principles. Builds a defensible decision history for LP letters and retrospectives.

Multi-dimensional deal evaluation

Team, market, product, terms, signaling — each dimension debated separately rather than collapsed into a single overall vibe.

Private — no signal leakage

Some deal evaluations can't happen in a fund Slack or in front of an associate. The Boardroom is private to your account.

Common questions

The questions people ask before they sign up.

Is this for institutional or angel investors?

Both, with different lineups. Angels typically run The Investor, The Skeptic, The Strategist, and The CFO. Institutional investors add The Data Scientist for portfolio-level analysis. Family offices and PE often add The Lawyer for deal-term review.

Can this replace partner debate at a fund?

No — partner debate has the value of relationship continuity and shared accountability. SynthBoard is the pre-partnership-meeting analysis tool. Many investors run sessions before Monday meetings to arrive with structured opposition already considered.

How does it handle deal-specific confidentiality?

Sessions are private. For maximally sensitive deals, use anonymized context (sector + stage + team profile without names). The structural recommendation will still apply. Always validate against your fund's AI-tool policies.

Can this help with LP reporting?

Indirectly — the decision-journal aspect produces a documented rationale for each deal you can reference in LP letters and quarterly reports. The Boardroom doesn't write LP comms directly, but the synthesized memos make the work faster.

How current is the Boardroom on current market conditions?

Synths reason from general patterns and current market context, not real-time data. For specific market-comp analysis (recent transaction multiples, sector heat), pair with your data subscriptions. The Boardroom is for the conviction layer, not the data-gathering layer.

Will the Boardroom argue against most deals?

No — it argues each deal on merit. The Skeptic surfaces objections, The Investor often counters them, and the synthesis lands a conviction read. Many investors report it surfaces conviction on deals they were leaning away from, not just objections to deals they were leaning into.

Keep exploring

Adjacent decisions, audiences, and methods inside SynthBoard.

VC edition

Specifically for venture-stage investors.

Explore

Angel edition

For private angels and syndicate leads.

Explore

Capital framework

Capital deployment framework.

Explore

Investment pre-mortem

Pre-mortem an investment decision.

Explore

Personal workflow

Individual investor workflow.

Explore

Investment sessions

Real investor sessions.

Explore

The advisor you don't have, on demand.

250 bonus credits at signup. 150 free every month. No card required.

Start Free See Pricing