Equity grants are forever. Run each one through a CFO, an Investor, a Lawyer, an Operator, and a Skeptic — and grant what's competitive without giving the cap table away.
The panel debates the right grant against your stage, the candidate's alternatives, and the role's impact.
The Lawyer and Investor debate vesting schedules, cliffs, and acceleration triggers calibrated to your situation.
The Operator designs refresh-grant cadence — usually missing and the silent cause of late-stage attrition.
The CFO and Skeptic debate when generous grants are recruitment leverage and when they're cap-table erosion.
Real questions. Multiple expert perspectives. Every time.
“First VP Engineering grant at our seed stage — 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%?”
“Early employee grants — what range for engineer #3 vs engineer #10?”
“Should we use ISO, NSO, or RSU at our stage?”
“Refresh grant policy — annual, every 2 years, or performance-based?”
“Accelerated vesting on acquisition — single-trigger or double-trigger?”
“Should we offer early-exercise to reduce later tax burden for employees?”
Each expert thinks independently — they won’t just agree with each other.
The CFO
Pressure-tests unit economics, runway, and capital allocation.
The Investor
Thinks like a board, an LP, and a downstream acquirer at once.
The Lawyer
Flags legal exposure and contract risk before they become incidents.
The Operator
Turns strategy into the boring, sequenced work that actually ships.
The Skeptic
Questions every premise. Finds blind spots others miss.
A synthesized recommendation from your team of experts — not just opinions, but structured analysis.
Moderate Agreement
Key Recommendations
Synthesized Recommendation
Grant the first VP Engineering 1.0% with 4-year vest, 1-year cliff, double-trigger acceleration. Implement annual refresh grants of 0.15% for retained employees starting year 2 — this is the most-missed policy and the primary cause of senior attrition at month 30. Use ISOs (or NSOs if international); skip RSUs until Series B.
Full analysis continues with detailed reasoning, trade-offs, and next steps...
Watch Out For
Expert Opinions
Most equity advice is grant-by-grant; the Boardroom debates the policy that produces consistent grants over time.
The Operator consistently surfaces refresh grants — usually missing from the conversation entirely.
Vesting and acceleration terms are debated by both legal and investor lenses, not in isolation.
Output is a starting equity policy you can take to your startup lawyer for finalization.
The questions people ask before they sign up.
At seed stage, typically 0.5-1.5% depending on role and candidate alternatives. The Investor and CFO will calibrate against your cap table. Generic ranges (like 1%) are often wrong by 50% in either direction for your specific case.
For US private companies pre-IPO, ISOs are usually best for early employees (favorable tax treatment); NSOs for international or above-limit grants; RSUs only at scale where 409A makes options unappealing. The Lawyer will calibrate for your situation.
The most under-rated part of equity compensation. Without refreshes, your senior people are fully vested at month 49 with nothing left to vest — usually the trigger for attrition. The Boardroom will design a refresh cadence for your situation.
Single-trigger (vesting on acquisition alone) heavily favors the employee and creates retention risk for acquirers. Double-trigger (acquisition + termination) is more common and balances both sides. The Lawyer and Investor will pressure-test for your context.
Yes — describe the candidate, role, grant proposed, and the panel will pressure-test against benchmarks and your cap table.
No — it sharpens the questions you take to them. A lawyer drafts the documents; a compensation consultant benchmarks specific grants. The Boardroom is the upstream policy debate that feeds both.
Adjacent decisions, audiences, and methods inside SynthBoard.
Deep dive on the ESOP design.
ExploreThe founder-level version of the same debate.
ExploreRecurring finance advisor.
ExploreSaaS-specific equity benchmarks.
ExploreHow AI debate compares to comp consulting.
ExploreHand the proposed grant to the Skeptic.
ExploreHow multi-Synth debate works.
Explore250 bonus credits at signup. 150 free every month. No card required.