The systematic monitoring of how each AI expert's stance on a question evolves — or holds firm — across multiple rounds of deliberation. Position tracking reveals which arguments are persuasive enough to shift an expert's view and which positions remain entrenched despite challenge.
An expert that changes position in response to strong evidence demonstrates intellectual honesty; one that holds firm despite mounting counter-evidence may reveal a genuine structural disagreement worth investigating. Position tracking transforms a static set of opinions into a dynamic map of how ideas compete and evolve.